Skip to main content

Reflections After Seminars

Before I became a teaching assistant, I was a student in a class and I was primarily concerned with my relationship between my teacher as well as my relationship with my other classmates. The main goal at that time was to do the best I can in the class. Being a good influence was another goal, but it wasn't the most important goal at that time. After participating in 2 TA seminars about educational psychology, my perspective has changed a lot. As a teaching assistant, my job is to cooperate with the teacher and make sure I complete my tasks correctly. I still get to interact with the students in the class, but it is a lot more formal because I grade their lab reports and homework. The weekly seminars are intended to help TAs achieve the following goal: be a role model to students and be act as a guide. That has made me pay attention to other parts of the classroom by observing how the teacher teaches, how students grow and learn, and how does the student-teacher relationship change over time. Before, I wouldn't really notice these aspects of learning. All I focused on was my individual learning. What makes it more interesting is that the psychology I learn from the seminars can be found the classroom. So far, the topics that have been covered are motivation (self-determination theory) and learning (zone of proximal development). Both are quite general topics but the seminars made them more specific by focusing on students. From the seminars, they have planted some seeds in my mind on how I can be a better TA by using the models and theories I learned to help students. These past events have made me more motivated to not be passive in the classroom by sitting in the corner doing paperwork. Instead, I should take an active approach by building individual relationships with the students. I can be more motivating and encouraging so I can help cultivate the conditions that will allow the students to perform better in class. I wouldn't say I am really motivating and encouraging because I don't draw smiley faces on their quizzes or point out what they did well on their labs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

YearCompass 2022-2023

 2022 had its highest highs and lowest lows. My freshman spring semester was not good, but at least I had the motivation to do well. Summer was probably the closest thing to utopia. Sophomore fall started off fine, but things eventually became a disaster and I am not exaggerating when I use the word "disaster."  Despite being aware of the many failures of this year, I think it is good for me to reflect upon 2022 and establish some goals and resolutions for 2023. Unlike previous years, I decided to give YearCompass a try since YearCompass provides a thorough examination and allows for deep contemplation.  Calendar Go through your calendar week by week. If you see an important event, family gathering, friendly get-together or a significant project, write it down here. Jan. 28-Jan. 30: NYC trip  Feb. 19: first BSO concert (Mozart and Bruckner) Mar. 20-Mar. 25: Washington DC trip  Apr. 16: Parkrun 5k May 11: Evgeny Kissin  Jun. 26: BAA 10k Jul. 24: Revere Beach...

My Accepted BU RISE Essays

BU RISE is a 6-week research program at Boston University. In 2019, the acceptance rate was around 16% so it is a selective program. There are two tracks- internship and practicum. The internship is the one I applied to because I wanted to work in a lab. Unfortunately, BU RISE in 2020 was cancelled due to COVID-19. If you are applying to BU RISE, these essays may be a source of inspiration.  1.Why you selected your field of interest and what you would like to research (300 words)  First choice: medical laboratory research (biochemistry) Second choice: chemistry  Ever since 2018, I participated in a Science Olympiad event called Protein Modeling that sparked my interest in proteins. When I learned about the anti-CRISPR protein, it alarmed me that the protein stopped CRISPR from working. Wondering how this could happen, I used Jmol to build and visualize the protein model. Over time, I no longer viewed proteins as messy globs. Instead, I appreciated that the protein’s disti...

The Frustrations of Wet Lab

     I am sitting at my desk in the lab, still mad and frustrated that I can’t even pipette properly. My cell counter results are dismal. I don’t know why I am getting such poor percentages for cell viability – I should be getting at least 90%, not 47%. I followed what my supervisor did an hour ago: perform a serial dilution four times, pipette trypan blue into each of the four wells, then pipette a bit of sample into the cell counter plate.       Fortunately, my supervisor came into the cell room to check on me and helped me with pipetting for the cell counter step. He got 89%, close to the ideal threshold. “I don’t know what’s going on,” he said. I could sense that his voice was tinged with frustration, which I understood. I was also mad for not having an answer. What exactly was wrong with my pipetting technique? Did I pipette too quickly, or did I not press the plunger correctly?       The whole cell counter incident frustrates ...